 The first time I saw "Eraserhead" was in 
the Ritzy Cinema in Brixton. My friend Gerry had already seen it in San 
Francisco and was still in paroxysms of praise for the picture so I went
 in with high expectations; even so, I still wasn't prepared for what I 
saw that night. I was meeting Gerry in the bar next door afterwards but 
when I left the cinema I was still in something of a daze, or perhaps a 
trance, and started walking in the wrong direction. I knew I had seen 
some kind of masterpiece but I also knew here was a film I wouldn't want
 to sit through again, at least not for a very long time. Well, here we 
are 40 years later and I've just seen "Eraserhead" again.
The first time I saw "Eraserhead" was in 
the Ritzy Cinema in Brixton. My friend Gerry had already seen it in San 
Francisco and was still in paroxysms of praise for the picture so I went
 in with high expectations; even so, I still wasn't prepared for what I 
saw that night. I was meeting Gerry in the bar next door afterwards but 
when I left the cinema I was still in something of a daze, or perhaps a 
trance, and started walking in the wrong direction. I knew I had seen 
some kind of masterpiece but I also knew here was a film I wouldn't want
 to sit through again, at least not for a very long time. Well, here we 
are 40 years later and I've just seen "Eraserhead" again. For 
anyone still ignorant of the fact, "Eraserhead" was the film that 
introduced David Lynch to the world and a few minutes into the film was 
enough to tell us that here was a singular new talent worthy to sit on a
 pedestal next to the young Welles, not that Welles would ever make a 
film like "Eraserhead"; indeed who, other than Lynch, would.
For 
anyone still ignorant of the fact, "Eraserhead" was the film that 
introduced David Lynch to the world and a few minutes into the film was 
enough to tell us that here was a singular new talent worthy to sit on a
 pedestal next to the young Welles, not that Welles would ever make a 
film like "Eraserhead"; indeed who, other than Lynch, would. There
 is a plot of sorts but essentially Lynch's film, luminously shot in 
black and white by Frederick Elmes and Herbert Cardwell, unfolds like a 
living nightmare, but whose? Lynch's? Henry's, (the central character 
that established Jack Nance as a cult actor for a new generation), or 
our own? Certainly there are images here enough to give the strongest of
 us nightmares, images and sounds, (this film has some of the finest 
sound designs ever recorded).
There
 is a plot of sorts but essentially Lynch's film, luminously shot in 
black and white by Frederick Elmes and Herbert Cardwell, unfolds like a 
living nightmare, but whose? Lynch's? Henry's, (the central character 
that established Jack Nance as a cult actor for a new generation), or 
our own? Certainly there are images here enough to give the strongest of
 us nightmares, images and sounds, (this film has some of the finest 
sound designs ever recorded).It has been described as experimental, as avant-garde and by some just as a plain old horror film. You could say it's also a kind of love story, though a very warped and forbidding one. Lynch, of course, would go on to the likes of "Blue Velvet" and "Twin Peaks" and would never fully abandon the sensibilites first seen in this extraordinary film. I was more prepared for it this time but it still blew me away.
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment