Religious belief is a subject not often discussed in the cinema and there are very few 'great' religious films; the best of them more often dealing with doubt than with faith, ("Ordet", "The Diary of a Country Priest"), while the ones dealing with visions and miracles often cheapen the subject, (Linda Darnell as the Virgin Mary in "The Song of Bernadette"). Now we have "The Apparition", a very detailed and serious account of the Catholic Church's investigations into determining whether a young girl's claims to have seen the Virgin Mary are true or not. The twist, for want of a better word, is that the man tasked with carrying out the investigation is a journalist and a non-believer still grieving over the loss of his colleague.
Xavier Gianolli's film is clearly a work of considerable intelligence that midway through appears to radically change course, though not quite in the way you might expect. As Jacques digs deeper into the girl's past the film becomes something of a policier; he might be investigating a murder or a kidnapping rather than a vision of the Blessed Virgin. Given that he has very little to do but look glum and ask questions Vincent Lindon is excellent as the investigator and given that she has very little to do but look enigmatic Galatea Bellugi is equally good as the girl. If, ultimately, the film never rises to the heights of "Ordet" it certainly deserves kudos for tackling a difficult subject in such a way as to make you think about the issues involved while keeping you entertained at the same time.
The films reviewed here represent those I have liked or loved over the years. It is not a list of my favourite films but all the films reviewed here are worth seeing and worth seeking out. I know many of you won't agree with me on a lot of these but hopefully you will grant me, and the films that appear here, our place in the sun. Thanks for reading.
Wednesday 31 October 2018
WITCHFINDER GENERAL
One of the most disturbing of all horror
movies, perhaps because it isn't really a conventional horror movie at
all but rather an historical drama, (it's set in England during the time
of the Civil War), dealing with the horrific subjects of witchcraft and
religious persecution. The central character is Matthew Hopkins, the
Witchfinder General of the title, (a never better Vincent Price), who
wanders the countryside in search of potential witches and satanists,
torturing and killing as he goes.
It is a very beautiful and a very cruel film; the tranquillity and beauty of the English countryside, (superbly shot by John Coquillon), offset by scenes of extreme violence. It was the third and final film of the young English director, Michael Reeves, before his early death from a barbiturate overdose and it displays a rare intelligence for a picture of this kind. As well as Price, there is fine work from Ian Ogilvy as a young Roundhead, Rupert Davies as one of Price's victims and Robert Russell as one of his henchmen. Considered 'a cheapie' at the time, it is now rightly revered as something of a classic.
It is a very beautiful and a very cruel film; the tranquillity and beauty of the English countryside, (superbly shot by John Coquillon), offset by scenes of extreme violence. It was the third and final film of the young English director, Michael Reeves, before his early death from a barbiturate overdose and it displays a rare intelligence for a picture of this kind. As well as Price, there is fine work from Ian Ogilvy as a young Roundhead, Rupert Davies as one of Price's victims and Robert Russell as one of his henchmen. Considered 'a cheapie' at the time, it is now rightly revered as something of a classic.
Tuesday 30 October 2018
MY TWENTIETH CENTURY
A film of great charm, beauty and invention and yet it's almost totally
unknown, Ildiko Enyedi's debut "My Twentieth Century" is ripe for
rediscovery. It's the story of twin girls, Dora and Lili, (both played
by Dorotha Segda), born in Budapest in 1880 but separated in early
childhood, one growing up to be an anarchist, the other a courtesan.
It's also the story of the inventions of one Thomas Edison and it's
wonderfully shot in black and white, with nods to the silent cinema, by
Tibor Mathe. Darting all over the place with no concessions to reality
it feels, at times, like it could have been made by Max Ophuls early in
his career and at other times like something from the Czech New Wave and
you might even be forgiven for thinking that Miguel Gomes may have seen
this before making "Tabu". Gorgeous, mysterious and unmissable.
VAN GOGH
The life and death of Van Gogh is a subject that has often been covered
in the cinema but almost certainly never better than by Maurice Pialat
in his extraordinary "Van Gogh" with Jacques Dutronc as the painter and
concentrating on the last couple of months of his life. It's a very
simple film, very matter-of-fact, with as great an emphasis on Van
Gogh's relationship with his doctor and his family and his brother Theo
and his wife as on the artist himself. It's also gorgeously photographed
by Gilles Henry, Jacques Loiseleux and Emmanuel Machuel with images
worthy of any film about any great artist while Dutronc is superb in the
title role but then the whole cast is superb with Alexandra London and
Corinne Bourdon particularly brilliant as the doctor's daughter who
falls for the artist and Theo's wife respectively. Arguably
Pialat's masterpiece.
Monday 29 October 2018
ANTIVIIRAL
More body-horror courtesy of Cronenberg but this time it's Cronenberg fils as opposed to Cronenberg pere. "Antiviral" is another dystopian fantasy set in a world that very much resembles our own but one in which a high-tech clinic sells celebrity viruses that are readily taken up by fans seeking a new thrill; illness as sexual pleasure with an obvious AIDS metaphor.
It's clear that young Cronenberg has been heavily influenced by his dad's early work, particularly "Shivers" and "Videodrome" with a little touch of "Soylent Green" thrown in for good measure but this is altogether more sophisticated than any of these and there's a nice touch of the living dead about the ashen-faced performance of Caleb Landry Jones as the Frankenstein figure who becomes his own monster as he injects more and more of the virus into his body. The plot may not always be the easiest to follow but this is a very stylish piece of sci-fi-cum-horror and it looks absolutely terrific.
It's clear that young Cronenberg has been heavily influenced by his dad's early work, particularly "Shivers" and "Videodrome" with a little touch of "Soylent Green" thrown in for good measure but this is altogether more sophisticated than any of these and there's a nice touch of the living dead about the ashen-faced performance of Caleb Landry Jones as the Frankenstein figure who becomes his own monster as he injects more and more of the virus into his body. The plot may not always be the easiest to follow but this is a very stylish piece of sci-fi-cum-horror and it looks absolutely terrific.
Sunday 28 October 2018
TABU
Floyd Crosby's superb cinematography won him a richly deserved Oscar
for F.W. Murnau's "Tabu". The film itself is a very simple, perhaps even
simplistic. love story of the kind we have become accustomed to hearing
since love stories first were told; boy loves girl, girl loves boy but
they can't be together because, in this case, the girl is decreed to be a
sacred virgin by the island chief.
The subtitle of the film is 'A Story of the South Seas' and Murnau, together with Robert Flaherty, made the film on the island of Bora Bora. There are very few inter-titles so the film is, for the most part, a truly visual experience. The cast is made up entirely of non-professionals; the leads are native islanders and if often feels like a documentary rather than a work of fiction. Of course, it also feels as primitive as the lifestyle it portrays; sophistication is the one thing it lacks but perhaps that is not such a bad thing. Fundamentally this is a tale of innocence and of paradise lost and it has stood the test of time
The subtitle of the film is 'A Story of the South Seas' and Murnau, together with Robert Flaherty, made the film on the island of Bora Bora. There are very few inter-titles so the film is, for the most part, a truly visual experience. The cast is made up entirely of non-professionals; the leads are native islanders and if often feels like a documentary rather than a work of fiction. Of course, it also feels as primitive as the lifestyle it portrays; sophistication is the one thing it lacks but perhaps that is not such a bad thing. Fundamentally this is a tale of innocence and of paradise lost and it has stood the test of time
Saturday 27 October 2018
THE OLD DARK HOUSE
James Whale's 1932 masterpiece is one of the most enjoyable films of its
kind ever made; even when it's terrible it's still glorious. "The Old
Dark House" set the bar for all spooky old house movies, (even if it
wasn't the first), and it's never been surpassed, (there was a dreadful
remake in 1963 which should be avoided). It was based on J. B.
Priestley's novel "Benighted" and takes place over the course of one
stormy night when a group of travellers, (Raymond Massey, Gloria
Stuart, Melvyn Douglas Charles Laughton and Lilian Bond), are stranded
in the crumbling old house of the title with its very weird inhabitants,
the Femms, (Ernest Thesiger, Eva Moore, Brember Wills and their 102
year old father played by Elspeth Dudgeon, but credited as John Dudgeon,
as well as their mute brute of a butler played by Boris Karloff, sans
the Boris in the credits). The Femms are all mad as hatters and they are
superbly played; once seen, and heard, they are unlikely to be
forgotten. On the other hand, both Massey and Douglas are very hammy
indeed, though Laughton shows all the promise of a great actor in an
early role. It's also superbly designed and photographed and although
clocking in at only 72 minutes it was obviously a prestige production
following hot on the heels of "Frankenstein". This old, dark house may
creak in places but it has also stood the test of time and, newly
restored, looks as good today as when it was first released.
Wednesday 24 October 2018
I WALK THE LINE
One of John Frankenhimer's best and certainly one of his most underrated
films. He made "I Walk the Line" in 1970 after an outstanding run of
films in the sixties and before the drought set in. Gregory Peck,
(superb), is the small-town sheriff who allows himself to be seduced by
Tuesday Weld's teenage nymphet and then finds his world falling apart.
It was brilliantly adapted by Alvin Sargent from a novel by Madison
Jones and also features great work from Estelle Parsons as Peck's wife,
Ralph Meeker as Weld's father and Charles Durning as Peck's deputy.
Weld, of course, is terrific if a little typecast. As the title
suggests, all the songs used in the film are by Johnny Cash and the
superb cinematography is by the great David M Walsh.
SHADOWS AND FOG
It isn't just Bergman and Fellini that
Woody is hung up on. In 1991's "Shadows and Fog" he spoofs not only
Fritz Lang and 1920's German Expressionism but also Franz Kafka. Shot superbly in black and white by Carlo Di Palma, (though you might feel Sven Nykvist would have been more appropriate), and with a phenomenal cast headed by Woody and Mia Farrow, this is a lot funnier than I remember it.
Woody is the Joseph K character briefly mistaken for the Peter Lorre character in "M" since a serial killer is lurking in the fog and the vigilantes are out to get him. If it feels more like one of Allen's short stories and if there isn't a great deal to get your teeth into, it's still very likeable and certainly didn't deserve the critical kicking it got on its release, including a fairly negative review from yours truly.
Woody is the Joseph K character briefly mistaken for the Peter Lorre character in "M" since a serial killer is lurking in the fog and the vigilantes are out to get him. If it feels more like one of Allen's short stories and if there isn't a great deal to get your teeth into, it's still very likeable and certainly didn't deserve the critical kicking it got on its release, including a fairly negative review from yours truly.
THE ENIGMA OF KASPAR HAUSER
As well as his onscreen relationship with
Klaus Kinski, Werner Herzog had, perhaps, an even more profound one with
the 'actor' Bruno S. I say 'actor' since watching Bruno S.'s work with
Herzog it becomes very difficult to separate the man from the performer.
He was discovered by Herzog and cast as 'the wild child' Kaspar Hauser
in Herzog's film "The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser" which was based on the
story of a boy, (though Bruno S. was in his forties at the time), who
wandered into a small German town in 1828 after having spent his entire
life locked in a cellar and away from humanity. With another,
professional actor in the role this might have seemed like fiction, an
exercize in the kind of acting almost destined to win Oscars but with
Bruno S. in the part it feels more like anthropology, an account, not of
the life of Kaspar Hauser, but of Bruno S. himself and from what we
know about Bruno S. this film, and his subsequent work, feels just a
little perverse.
Nevertheless, this is an extraordinary piece of work, one of Herzog's best films. Every shot is composed solely for the purpose of our getting closer to Kaspar, even if he himself isn't on screen. Of course, Herzog has always been a relentless film-maker, whether exploring the mind of Kaspar Hauser or having Fitzcarraldo drag a ship over a hill. In this case, little things mean a lot and it's this accumulation of small details that makes "The Engima of Kaspar Hauser" so fascinating. The same story has, of course, been told in a very different film, namely Truffaut's "L'Enfant Sauvage" and while very different, both are works of art and really should not be missed.
Nevertheless, this is an extraordinary piece of work, one of Herzog's best films. Every shot is composed solely for the purpose of our getting closer to Kaspar, even if he himself isn't on screen. Of course, Herzog has always been a relentless film-maker, whether exploring the mind of Kaspar Hauser or having Fitzcarraldo drag a ship over a hill. In this case, little things mean a lot and it's this accumulation of small details that makes "The Engima of Kaspar Hauser" so fascinating. The same story has, of course, been told in a very different film, namely Truffaut's "L'Enfant Sauvage" and while very different, both are works of art and really should not be missed.
Monday 22 October 2018
THE HIRELING
Another of L.P. Hartley's tales of class
and sexual obsession, this one was brought to the screen in 1973 by Alan
Bridges, who also made "The Shooting Party", and despite winning three
BAFTAs and the Palme D'Or at Cannes has all but disappeared. Like "The
Go-Between" this, too, is about a relationship that develops between a
titled lady, (Sarah Miles), and a member of the working class, (Robert
Shaw), but unlike "The Go-Between", this is a somewhat small-scale
affair though psychologically it is just as astute.
It is set in the years after the First World War and Miles is the young widow recovering from a nervous breakdown after the death of her husband and Shaw is the man hired to drive her around and who develops an unhealthy obsession with his employer and they are both superb. The fine supporting cast includes a young Peter Egan as a smug Liberal Member of Parliament and Elizabeth Sellars as Miles' chilly mother while the screenplay by Wolf Mankowitz is typically literate. In fact, you might describe the film itself as chilly. It is certainly old-fashioned but with a degree of frankness that would have been unheard of 20 years earlier and it deserves to be seen.
It is set in the years after the First World War and Miles is the young widow recovering from a nervous breakdown after the death of her husband and Shaw is the man hired to drive her around and who develops an unhealthy obsession with his employer and they are both superb. The fine supporting cast includes a young Peter Egan as a smug Liberal Member of Parliament and Elizabeth Sellars as Miles' chilly mother while the screenplay by Wolf Mankowitz is typically literate. In fact, you might describe the film itself as chilly. It is certainly old-fashioned but with a degree of frankness that would have been unheard of 20 years earlier and it deserves to be seen.
TWENTY-FOUR EYES
Keisuke Kinoshita is perhaps among the least known, here in the West, of
all the great Japanese directors and his films are not often seen here.
His 1954 film "Twenty-Four Eyes" is one of his very best pictures yet
it is hardly known at all now despite having won the Golden Globe for
Best Foreign Film, (it's sentimental story of an inspirational teacher
is just the sort of thing that would appeal to an American audience
though this masterpiece is altogether deeper). What distinguishes it
from, say, a similar American film is not only Kinoshita's superb
narrative but a wonderful feeling for landscape, (it's set on one of
Japan's largest islands), as well as the beautifully naturalistic
performances of all of the children. At over two and a half hours it
never outstays its welcome despite most of its major dramas happening
off screen. It's also one of the most subtle of all post-war Japanese
films to touch on political issues as well as the War itself, (it begins
in 1928 and covers a period of 18 years). It is also a film of
considerable charm and is, finally, incredibly moving. This is a real
discovery that should rightly restore Kinoshita to the very front rank
of world class directors.
Sunday 21 October 2018
PHANTOM LADY
Robert Siodmak's masterpiece and one of the greatest, and least
known, of all film-noirs "Phantom Lady", adapted by Bernard C Schoenfeld
from a Cornell Woolrich novel, published as William Irish, and
stunningly shot in black and white by Elwood Bredell, even manages to
overcome the one-dimensional performances of Alan Curtis and Ella Raines
as Siodmak wastes absolutely no time in getting down to basics. Curtis is the engineer whose wife is murdered. His alibi is that he met a mysterious
woman in a bar and spent the evening with her but when he tries to
track her down she has not only disappeared but no-one else remembers
seeing her and it's left to his secretary, (Raines) to prove his
innocence.
The plot doesn't
really stand close scrutiny but Siodmak handles it with tremendous brio
with several scenes worthy of Hitchcock at his best. The real killer is
revealed midway through but again, with a typically Hitchcockian
flourish, Siodmak shifts our attention to the killer and his efforts to
make sure Raines doesn't achieve her goal. The movie is a classic but
the best we can say is that's a cult classic and one that shouldn't be
missed.
Friday 19 October 2018
DARLING
"Darling" is John Schlesinger's 1965 film about living La Dolce Vita and
hating every boring, opulent minute of it. It's all about Diana who
sleeps her way to the top, marries a prince but is terribly unhappy.
No, not that Diana and not that prince; that's an entirely different
movie! This Diana is called Scott, not Spencer, and she's played by
Julie Christie and she's stunning. Christie came from nowhere, (well, "Billy Liar"to be exact), and was enough of a breath of fresh air
in sixties cinema to get her the Oscar. Among the men she picks up and
drops, or who drop her, are Dirk Bogarde, (superb, and winning a
BAFTA), Laurence Harvey and Ronald Curram. Bogarde leaves his wife for
her, Harvey's a heel, (isn't he always), and Curram's gay so her
interest in him is purely platonic. It was a huge hit and writer
Frederic Raphael also won the Oscar for his highly original screenplay.
It was also the film that established Schlesinger as an international
director of note. Now, of course, it's something of a period piece as
so many mid-sixties movies are, (and it's at its worst in the obligatory
orgy sequence), but there's so much talent on view that it's a very
difficult film to dislike and it's still surprisingly entertaining.
Thursday 18 October 2018
FIRST MAN
In the opening moments of Damien Chazelle's new movie "First Man" we
encounter Neil Armstrong on the periphery of space in a rocket that
isn't doing what it's supposed to be doing. It's a terrific scene,
genuinely frightening, (even if we know Mr Armstrong is going to come
out of it in one piece), shot up close and personal and superbly edited
and directed by young Chazelle, (he's the youngest person ever to win
the Oscar for Best Director). That's just the beginning of this
brilliant film about the Gemini and Apollo Missions that saw Neil
Armstrong become the first man to walk on the moon and there are several
other heart-stopping moments to follow. This is the most authentic
looking of all the manned space mission movies to date and Chazelle
films it as if it were a documentary, which isn't to say he ignores the
human side.
Armstrong is
played by that most taciturn of actors, Ryan Gosling, and here the
silences, the 'meaningful' stares really work for him. A lot of the time
Chazelle chooses to shoot him in close-up and in Gosling's face we can
read everything the man is feeling. He is matched by the much more
pragmatic performance of Claire Foy as his wife. There is also not a jot
of sentimentality on display despite there being every opportunity to
milk it, (early on Armstrong's young daughter dies, several of his
colleagues are killed and then, of course, there is the triumphalism of
the ending). Instead Chazelle gives us a level-headed view of those
years, even going so far as to paint Buzz Aldrin as a somewhat vain
individual and including, at one stage, the protest number 'Whitney on
the Moon'. The quietude of the ending is also deeply affecting and if
Chazelle were to win his second Oscar for this I certainly won't be
complaining.
Wednesday 17 October 2018
LATE CHRYSANTHEMUMS
Unlike those of his contemporaries, Mizoguchi, Ozu and Kurosawa, the
films of Mikio Naruse are mostly unknown in the West and yet they are
just as relevant and just as powerful. The "Late Chrysanthemums" of this
extraordinary film are four ageing former Geishas with money problems and this is one of the most insightful of films dealing with the role of women in post-war Japanese society and not just the women at the centre who once sold their bodies but who now have nothing to barter but also the daughter of one of them who is prepared to marry an
older man for financial security. Money is at the basis of everything
that happens in the film and it taints the lives of all the characters.
It is superbly played, particularly by those great Japanese actresses Haruko Sugimura as the moneylender Okin and Chikako Hosokawa as the drunken Otamae. Like Naruse, these two actresses never really 'crossed over' to the West and yet their work in Japanese cinema is as fine as any to have graced international cinema while this is a film on a subject that, in hindsight, would never have been tackled in Western cinema at this time. Of course that, in itself, does not make it a masterpiece but a masterpiece it is, nevertheless. It is one of the greatest of all films on the disappointments that life throws at us.
It is superbly played, particularly by those great Japanese actresses Haruko Sugimura as the moneylender Okin and Chikako Hosokawa as the drunken Otamae. Like Naruse, these two actresses never really 'crossed over' to the West and yet their work in Japanese cinema is as fine as any to have graced international cinema while this is a film on a subject that, in hindsight, would never have been tackled in Western cinema at this time. Of course that, in itself, does not make it a masterpiece but a masterpiece it is, nevertheless. It is one of the greatest of all films on the disappointments that life throws at us.
THE PRODUCERS
Peter Sellers and I have at least one thing in common; we both agree
that Mel Brooks' masterpiece "The Producers" is the funniest film ever
made. I've watched it countless times just as I've watched the
competition countless times, ("Airplane", "Les Vacances du M Hulot" perhaps
some Keaton or Chaplin or maybe even Preston Sturges' "The Palm Beach Story"), but no other film creases me up or causes me such delicious pain
as "The Producers". Of course, it isn't to everyone's taste. The great
British critic Dilys Powell was appalled by it. Dilys had lived through
the War and didn't think Hitler or the Nazi Party was anything to joke
about and yes, I know there are some things that are still sacred but
I'm also inclined towards the dictum that nothing's sacred if it's funny
and how can anyone not find "The Producers" funny?
It was Brooks' first feature and he won the Oscar for his screenplay, (something of a feat in itself for a comedy). Later films such as"Blazing Saddles" and "Young Frankenstein"were more polished but great as they are they never quite scale the dizzy heights of bad taste and quick-fire brilliance that "The Producers" does and they lacked one crucial element namely Zero Mostel whose performance as Max Bialystock might arguably be the finest by any actor in any comedy ever. Brooks subsequently turned it into a Broadway musical which was in turn filmed by that show's director, Susan Stroman. It was fun but it's no classic.
It was Brooks' first feature and he won the Oscar for his screenplay, (something of a feat in itself for a comedy). Later films such as"Blazing Saddles" and "Young Frankenstein"were more polished but great as they are they never quite scale the dizzy heights of bad taste and quick-fire brilliance that "The Producers" does and they lacked one crucial element namely Zero Mostel whose performance as Max Bialystock might arguably be the finest by any actor in any comedy ever. Brooks subsequently turned it into a Broadway musical which was in turn filmed by that show's director, Susan Stroman. It was fun but it's no classic.
Tuesday 16 October 2018
THE WIFE
So the plot may be predictable and the
ending a little too tidy but there are other things that can hold you in
a vice-like grip at the movies. Perhaps you do need a director who
knows what he's doing and a screenplay that doesn't insult our
intelligence and "The Wife" certainly has both but the real pleasure to
be had from this movie lies elsewhere. I have often said great acting is
its own reward and this predictable and tidy film is blessed with, not
one, but two great performances, (and several very good ones from among
the supporting cast).
It is a love story and it's about a woman who has lived in her husband's shadow. He is a writer and he has just won the Nobel Prize for Literature and she is a former student who has become his second wife. They are played by Glenn Close, the wife, and Jonathan Pryce, the prize-winning husband, and they are both magnificent. Indeed, I don't think Close has ever been this good before. Her downward glances, (modesty or maybe something else?), her silences are devastating. She is a woman with secrets, a bomb that might explode at any moment or one that may have been diffused years before. Close draws us in to this woman's hidden world and keeps us guessing. This is great acting indeed.
Pryce, too, matches her; an obvious adulterer and not the most likeable of men, his bombast and his bonhomie nevertheless seems false. He also has his secrets and the pleasure one gets from watching them together really is enormous. There are flashbacks to their earlier lives; he is played then, and very well, by Harry Lloyd and she is played by Close's real-life daughter Annie Starke. They also have a son, an aspiring writer beautifully played by Max Irons, also living in the shadow of his more famous prize-winning father just as Irons has lived in the shadow of his own more famous Oscar-winning father, (was he cast for this very reason?), and Christian Slater is excellent as Pryce's slimey, would-be and very unofficial biographer.
Of course, without the intelligence of the dialogue and the probing direction of Bjorn Runge neither lead might have risen to the occasion but rise they have. It's rare today to see a mainstream film that holds you, not by action but by words and by what the performers bring to the table. Close certainly deserves an Oscar but so, too, does Pryce. This is one film that really must be seen.
It is a love story and it's about a woman who has lived in her husband's shadow. He is a writer and he has just won the Nobel Prize for Literature and she is a former student who has become his second wife. They are played by Glenn Close, the wife, and Jonathan Pryce, the prize-winning husband, and they are both magnificent. Indeed, I don't think Close has ever been this good before. Her downward glances, (modesty or maybe something else?), her silences are devastating. She is a woman with secrets, a bomb that might explode at any moment or one that may have been diffused years before. Close draws us in to this woman's hidden world and keeps us guessing. This is great acting indeed.
Pryce, too, matches her; an obvious adulterer and not the most likeable of men, his bombast and his bonhomie nevertheless seems false. He also has his secrets and the pleasure one gets from watching them together really is enormous. There are flashbacks to their earlier lives; he is played then, and very well, by Harry Lloyd and she is played by Close's real-life daughter Annie Starke. They also have a son, an aspiring writer beautifully played by Max Irons, also living in the shadow of his more famous prize-winning father just as Irons has lived in the shadow of his own more famous Oscar-winning father, (was he cast for this very reason?), and Christian Slater is excellent as Pryce's slimey, would-be and very unofficial biographer.
Of course, without the intelligence of the dialogue and the probing direction of Bjorn Runge neither lead might have risen to the occasion but rise they have. It's rare today to see a mainstream film that holds you, not by action but by words and by what the performers bring to the table. Close certainly deserves an Oscar but so, too, does Pryce. This is one film that really must be seen.
COLD WAR
There are two cold wars going on in Pawel Pawlikowski astonishingly
good film, (he won the Best Director prize at Cannes). The most obvious
one is the one between East and West during the period in which the film
is set, (it covers the years 1949 to 1964), a time when, simply moving
from one country to another 'illegally' is enough to get you called a
spy and sent to a prison camp for 15 years but the other cold war is the
one between its protagonists, Wiktor, (an excellent
Tomasz Kot), and Zula, (a stunning Joanna Kulig), who are almost crazy
with love for each other but who can't live together or, it would
appear, apart.
We first
meet them in Poland in 1949 when Wiktor is one of a group of musicians
touring rural Poland in search of authentic folk artists that they would
mould into a musical company. Zula is the exceedingly pretty and
talented young girl who catches Wiktor's eye; in time they have sex and
start a love affair. Years pass; they meet and part and move from East
to West and back again. The Cold War going on around them does little
for their self-esteem. As Wiktor tries to hold it together, earning a
living playing piano in a Parisian jazz club, Zula hits the bottle.
Hollywood has done this kind of thing in the past but seldom with this
degree of fierceness.
Pawlikowski shoots his relatively short film, (it clocks in at under 90 minutes), in a series of compact scenes that simply fade to black, mostly to denote the passage of time, in stunning black and white, (his DoP is Lukasz Zal). He also uses music to great effect, both Eastern European folk and in the second half, American jazz. If the term 'musical-comedy' is an over-used one then let's call this extraordinary film a 'musical-tragedy'.
Pawlikowski shoots his relatively short film, (it clocks in at under 90 minutes), in a series of compact scenes that simply fade to black, mostly to denote the passage of time, in stunning black and white, (his DoP is Lukasz Zal). He also uses music to great effect, both Eastern European folk and in the second half, American jazz. If the term 'musical-comedy' is an over-used one then let's call this extraordinary film a 'musical-tragedy'.
Sunday 7 October 2018
LIFE DURING WARTIME
If you can imagine a postscript to Todd Solondz's "Happiness" but done as a kind of comic-strip in bright, rainbow colours, (Ed Lachman did the photography), then you're about halfway to getting "Life During Wartime". A sequel of sorts to "Happiness", this takes place several years after the events of that film but Solondz has completely recast it, (in one case a character who was white in the first film is now an African-American), and opens the film with an almost identical reprise of "Happiness'" opening scene.
It really shouldn't work at all; surely "Happiness" was good enough 'to stand alone' but it does work thanks to Solondz's skewed, if deeply funny, vision of humanity and to his extraordinary new cast who fit perfectly into the shoes of their predecessors, even down to that racial crossover. It's almost impossible to single out anyone over anyone else but as the three tragic-comic sisters Allison Janney, Shirley Henderson and Ally Sheedy are terrific while Irish actor Ciaran Hinds gives a much steelier edge to the paedophile father than did Dylan Baker. Of the new characters Michael Lerner is outstanding as Janney's Jewish suitor. This is indeed a black comedy that can rightly take its place beside the movie it follows and it simply shouldn't be missed.
It really shouldn't work at all; surely "Happiness" was good enough 'to stand alone' but it does work thanks to Solondz's skewed, if deeply funny, vision of humanity and to his extraordinary new cast who fit perfectly into the shoes of their predecessors, even down to that racial crossover. It's almost impossible to single out anyone over anyone else but as the three tragic-comic sisters Allison Janney, Shirley Henderson and Ally Sheedy are terrific while Irish actor Ciaran Hinds gives a much steelier edge to the paedophile father than did Dylan Baker. Of the new characters Michael Lerner is outstanding as Janney's Jewish suitor. This is indeed a black comedy that can rightly take its place beside the movie it follows and it simply shouldn't be missed.
Saturday 6 October 2018
CRY-BABY
How could you not love any movie with a cast like this? John Waters' homage to "Grease" may prove to be something of a disappointment to fans of "Pink Flamingos" and "Desperate Living" but it's still a kitsch classic nevertheless and it has a fifties rock 'n roll score to die for. The plot hardly matters, (bad boy falls for good girl), but Waters' cast of resurrected 'stars' of the sixties and earlier, (spot Troy Donahue, David Nelson, Susan Tyrrell, Polly Bergen, Joey Heatherton), as well as icons like Joe D'Allesandro, Iggy Pop, Ricki Lake, Mink Stole and, in a cameo, Willem Dafoe make this a camp treat. Hard to believe that these already over-aged teenagers are now almost thirty years older than they were when this was made
Thursday 4 October 2018
A FACE IN THE CROWD
"A Face in the Crowd" is one of Elia Kazan's largely forgotten films, (it never achieved the success that "A Streetcar Named Desire" or "On the Waterfront" did). It's a sour and not very pleasant picture but it's brilliantly done. It's the story of 'Lonesome' Rhodes, a drifter first seen in a county jail. You could say Lonesome is a cross between Will Rogers, Woody Guthrie and Joe McCarthy; in other words, he's not as homespun as he first appears. He's played by Andy Griffith who, you might say, had a face built for radio. Griffith may not have had the looks of a young Brando or Newman but he had all of their charisma in spades and under Kazan's intuitive direction he gives a superb performance. He's matched every step of the way by Patricia Neal, magnificent in a career-best performance, as the homely Southern belle who first discovers Lonesome while Walter Matthau, Anthony Franciosa and Lee Remick are all terrific as satellites in Lonesome's orbit. It was written by Budd Schulberg who dissects the media and all its power with a razor sharp intensity to match Paddy Chayefsky and "Network", at least up to its final stretch when it loses its satiric edge and dissolves into melodrama. It was also completely ignored by the Academy.
Wednesday 3 October 2018
OUR CHILDREN
"Our Children" deals with the subject of infanticide which doesn't make it the easiest film to watch though the bulk of the film is taken up with the fraught relationship between a young married couple and the husband's 'adopted' father, a doctor who has the taken the man, who is Moroccan, under his wing, treating him like a son. It's a relationship that finally drives the wife and mother to commit that most terrible of crimes. (I'm not giving anything away as the film opens on the aftermath of this act). It's a film that depends almost entirely on the interplay between the three main characters and in these roles Niels Arestrup, (the doctor), and Tahar Rahim and Emilie Dequenne, (the couple), are superb. (Dequenne won the Best Actress award at Cannes). In fact, so good are these players it makes the downward spiral into violence extremely uncomfortable viewing; those opening scenes preparing you for what's in store and yet the director, Jaochim Lafosse, always manages to keep us at a discreet and safe distance, at least until that point when things become too much for the young woman, (and us), to bear. There's a clinical detachment to the way things are viewed in this film that would be unheard of in a similarly themed American film, just as the strange relationship between the two male characters would not be touched on. Indeed, you could say this is the kind of film that only a European director might make; America take note.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
BEYOND THERAPY
Proof that even Robert Altman can cook a rancid turkey. "Beyond Therapy", which he co-wrote with Christopher Durang from Durang...
-
Having made two films on the essence of cinema or at least on the filmmaker's craft, (her own), Joanna Hogg has now turned her attentio...
-
Not quite a comedy, a drama or a musical but something of all three, "This Could Be the Night" is one of the Robert Wise movies t...