data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a14fa/a14faf146a07ef6f0f6f1e62c2cfa9c5a7e2e499" alt=""
Sometimes I wonder if it's just me; at
other times I'm convinced that critical snobbery really is alive and
well. For many critics a director can do anything but be successful. The
latest case in point is Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu who may be raking
in the Oscars but is now fashionable to slag off and for that very
reason. Nothing like back to back gold statuettes to attract those
critical brickbats.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1945/e1945aec897f5f85dc4dcf558795115ebc7b3210" alt=""
Last year Inarritu won both the Best Director
and Best Picture Oscars for "Birdman", not to mention the screenplay
prize. In a year that also saw "Boyhood" I felt this was a bit excessive
but while "Birdman" may not have been the year's Best Picture it was
infinitely better than many critics suggested; bold, innovative and one
of the great movies about the theatre. Now we have "The Revenant", a
two-and-a-half hour wilderness epic about survival that has just
received 12 Oscar nominations and would appear very much the one to beat
when it comes to handing out the awards. It's also become very
fashionable, in some critical quarters, to pan it and to pan Inarritu,
not just for having the audacity in making it in the first place, but
suddenly for his entire body of work, as if success at the Oscars was
beneath a real artist.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99207/992078d3726ac35b0bf6f8f426b53cec75c1ab1c" alt=""
Okay, I don't think it's a masterpiece but
it's also bold, innovative and the work of a visionary director who
isn't afraid to take chances even if they don't always pay off.
Basically it's the story of one man, Hugh Glass, (a terrific Leonardo Di
Caprio), left for dead by his fellow trappers in the wilderness, (the
title comes from the French for ghost or perhaps more appropriately
someone returning from the dead), as he makes his way back to what
passes for civilisation to extract his revenge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be6db/be6dbc74fb942068d6c1552e8cae8fc6b35c3c8e" alt=""
It's a long and
gruelling picture, never more so than for Di Caprio who is really put
through the mill here and while there are several scenes of action and
excitement there are equally long stretches when absolutely nothing
happens. Perhaps, with a bit of judicious pruning, Inarritu could have
made a tighter film, (there is only so much of Di Caprio wandering
through the snowy wastes we can take), but I am also out on whether
shrinking the film would have improved it. What we have is very much
Inarritu's vision, warts and all, and in an age when commercial
film-makers tend to play safe, it's great to see someone break
the rules.
Visually it's extraordinary, (once again the stunning
cinematography is in the safe hands of Emmanuel Lubezki), and as well as
Di Caprio there is equally fine work from Domhnall Gleeson as the
captain who tries to save him and Tom Hardy, (stealing every scene he's
in), as the villainous Fitzgerald. Last year I felt "Birdman's" Oscar
glory was undeserved; this year I will have no such reservations when
"The Revenant" sweeps the board.
No comments:
Post a Comment